A no-install, client-first Marker.io alternative
UX Peeker vs Marker.io
Looking for a Marker.io alternative? Both tools let people report issues visually on a website. The difference is shape: Marker.io is a developer-focused bug-reporting tool — you install a feedback widget on your site, and reports capture deep technical data (console + network logs, session replay) that sync two-way into Jira, Linear or Trello. UX Peeker is a client-first review workspace — nothing to install (it mirrors the live site through a proxy), reviewers pin comments on the page, every comment becomes a task on a built-in board, and clients review through a no-login link. There is also a free plan.
What is UX Peeker?
UX Peeker is an all-in-one review workspace for live websites and web apps. Pin comments on the live page (no widget to install), record your screen and voice, and every comment becomes a task automatically. Clients review through a no-login portal, tasks deep-link back to the exact pin, and there is a free plan to start.
What is Marker.io?
Marker.io (marker.io) is a website feedback, bug-reporting and UAT tool. You embed a feedback widget on your site; reporters mark up a high-fidelity screenshot, and each report auto-captures technical metadata — browser, OS, screen size, plus console and network logs. It includes session replay (watch what the user did before reporting) and two-way sync with Jira, Linear, Trello, GitHub and Asana. AI features (auto language detection/translation) are in beta.
Feature comparison
| Feature | UX Peeker | Marker.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visual feedback on a live website | ||
| No-login / guest feedback for clients | ||
| Works without installing a widget or snippet on the site | No | |
| Built-in Kanban task board | Built-in | Via integrations |
| Turn comments into tasks | ||
| Screen + voice recording on feedback | Verify | |
| Auto-capture console + network logs | No | |
| Session replay | No | |
| Review live web apps | ||
| Free plan | No | |
| Two-way PM integrations (Jira, Linear, Trello…) | No | |
| AI feedback features | No | Beta |
We only mark a ✓ where we've verified it. Cells labelled "Verify" are Marker.io features we haven't independently confirmed — please check Marker.io's current site, as products change.
The key differences
No install vs widget/snippet
Marker.io needs a feedback widget embedded on your site (or a browser extension) before anyone can report. UX Peeker mirrors the site through a proxy, so there is nothing for you or the client to install to start reviewing.
Built-in tasks vs PM sync
Marker.io is built around two-way sync into Jira/Linear/Trello — ideal if your team already lives there. UX Peeker has its own Kanban board built in, so feedback becomes trackable work without a second tool or subscription.
Developer depth vs client simplicity
Marker.io captures console logs, network logs and session replay — excellent for developers debugging. UX Peeker is lighter and client-first, centred on pinned comments, recording and a no-login portal rather than deep technical capture.
Pricing
As of mid-2026, Marker.io has no free plan — paid plans run from about $39/month (Starter, 3 users) to $149 (Team, 15 users) and $499 (Business, 50 users), each with a 15-day trial. UX Peeker has a free plan and paid tiers from $19/month. Confirm current pricing on each site.
Where Marker.io is strong
- Deep technical capture — console logs, network logs, browser/OS/device — on every report.
- Session replay to see exactly what the user did before reporting.
- Mature two-way integrations with Jira, Linear, Trello, GitHub and Asana.
Which should you pick?
Choose UX Peeker if…
Agencies, freelancers and teams who want client-first review on live sites and web apps — pinned comments, recording, built-in tasks and a no-login portal — with nothing to install and a free plan.
Choose Marker.io if…
Developer teams running website QA/UAT who want deep technical bug data (console/network logs, session replay) flowing straight into Jira or Linear, and don't mind installing a widget.